More shadows than lights in political parties’ human rights commitments

ประเภท เลขเรียก สถานที่ สถานะ

JQ1749.A15 I612 2019 c.1

มุมหนังสือทั่วไป บนชั้น ขอยืม

JQ1749.A15 I612 2019 c.2

มุมหนังสือทั่วไป บนชั้น ขอยืม
เลขเรียก
JQ1749.A15 I612 2019
ผู้แต่งนิติบุคคล
ชื่อเรื่อง
More shadows than lights in political parties’ human rights commitments / International Federation for Human Rights
ชื่อเรื่องที่แตกต่าง
เงามืดมากกว่าแสงสว่าง พรรคการเมืองของไทยและพันธกิจด้านสิทธิมนุษยชน
พิมพลักษณ์
Bangkok : International Federation for Human Rights, 2019.
รูปเล่ม
30 p. : ill. ; 30 cm.
หมายเหตุสารบัญ
Executive summary
--Background: junta at the helm amid tightly controlled election environment
--Survey findings: more shadows than lights
--Lights: human rights defenders, refugees, detention conditions
--Shadows: freedom of expression, role of the military, women’s rights, the death penalty, and impunity for human rights violations
--Recommendations to elected members of parliament.
บทคัดย่อ
The report is based on the findings of a survey conducted by FIDH among 32 Thai political parties. The survey revealed that, despite some positive commitments regarding human rights defenders, detention conditions, and refugees and asylum seekers, political parties were reluctant to address some of the most critical issues impacting human rights and democratic principles in Thailand. The survey found little support from political parties for measures aimed at improving the enjoyment of the right to freedom of opinion and expression. Only a small minority favored the amendment of criminal defamation laws, while the overwhelming majority did not support the removal of jail terms for violators of Article 112 of the Criminal Code (lèse-majesté). Disappointingly, the majority of political parties expressed strong support for the death penalty. As Thailand remains mired in a culture of deeply entrenched impunity, it was equally discouraging to note the political parties’ lack of enthusiasm for impartial investigations into allegations of serious human rights violations, including in Thailand’s ‘Deep South.’ The survey also revealed reluctance to limit the role of the military in Thailand’s political affairs. Less than half of the parties surveyed said they would significantly reduce the military’s budget, and only a few parties saw security sector reform as a main priority for the next government. On a more positive note, the survey showed that the majority of the parties support legislation that incorporates the principle of non-refoulement for refugees and asylum seekers. Half of the political parties favored adopting concrete measure to address Thailand’s abysmal prison conditions by incorporating provisions of international standards related to the treatment of prisoners into domestic legislation. The survey also highlighted the political parties’ support for regular engagement with human rights defenders. The numerous recommendations contained in the report provide a clear agenda for parliamentary action to concretely address Thailand’s key human rights issues after the election.
หมายเหตุแหล่งที่มา
With the compliments of Mrs. Angkhana Neelapaijit
หัวเรื่อง
หัวเรื่อง
หัวเรื่อง
คำศัพท์
ผู้แต่งนิติบุคคล
ผู้แต่งนิติบุคคล
เชื่อมโยง
เชื่อมโยง
LEADER : 00000nab 2200000uu 4500
008   190319s2019||||th 000 0 eng d
050 00^aJQ1749.A15^bI612 2019
110 1 ^aInternational Federation for Human Rights
245 00^aMore shadows than lights in political parties’ human rights commitments /^cInternational Federation for Human Rights
246 30^aเงามืดมากกว่าแสงสว่าง พรรคการเมืองของไทยและพันธกิจด้านสิทธิมนุษยชน
260   ^aBangkok :^bInternational Federation for Human Rights, ^c2019.
300   ^a30 p. :^bill. ^c30 cm.
505 0 ^aExecutive summary --^tBackground: junta at the helm amid tightly controlled election environment --^tSurvey findings: more shadows than lights --^tLights: human rights defenders, refugees, detention conditions --^tShadows: freedom of expression, role of the military, women’s rights, the death penalty, and impunity for human rights violations --^tRecommendations to elected members of parliament.
520   ^aThe report is based on the findings of a survey conducted by FIDH among 32 Thai political parties. The survey revealed that, despite some positive commitments regarding human rights defenders, detention conditions, and refugees and asylum seekers, political parties were reluctant to address some of the most critical issues impacting human rights and democratic principles in Thailand.  The survey found little support from political parties for measures aimed at improving the enjoyment of the right to freedom of opinion and expression. Only a small minority favored the amendment of criminal defamation laws, while the overwhelming majority did not support the removal of jail terms for violators of Article 112 of the Criminal Code (lèse-majesté). Disappointingly, the majority of political parties expressed strong support for the death penalty. As Thailand remains mired in a culture of deeply entrenched impunity, it was equally discouraging to note the political parties’ lack of enthusiasm for impartial investigations into allegations of serious human rights violations, including in Thailand’s ‘Deep South.’  The survey also revealed reluctance to limit the role of the military in Thailand’s political affairs. Less than half of the parties surveyed said they would significantly reduce the military’s budget, and only a few parties saw security sector reform as a main priority for the next government.  On a more positive note, the survey showed that the majority of the parties support legislation that incorporates the principle of non-refoulement for refugees and asylum seekers. Half of the political parties favored adopting concrete measure to address Thailand’s abysmal prison conditions by incorporating provisions of international standards related to the treatment of prisoners into domestic legislation. The survey also highlighted the political parties’ support for regular engagement with human rights defenders.  The numerous recommendations contained in the report provide a clear agenda for parliamentary action to concretely address Thailand’s key human rights issues after the election.
536   ^aWith the compliments of Mrs. Angkhana Neelapaijit
650  4^aHuman Rights^zThailand  
650  4^aPolitical parties^zThailand  
650  4^aCivil rights^zThailand
653   ^aNew Arrivals 04-2019
710 1 ^aสมาพันธ์สิทธิมนุษยชนสากล
710 1 ^aFIDH
856 40^zFull text^uhttps://www.fidh.org/IMG/pdf/thailande731aweb.pdf
856 40^3Content^uhttp://library.nhrc.or.th/ulib/document/Content/T10500.pdf
917   ^aGift :^c200
955   ^a2 copies
999   ^anopparat
เลื่อนขึ้นด้านบน